首页> 外文OA文献 >Procedural errors during root canal preparation using rotary NiTi instruments detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography
【2h】

Procedural errors during root canal preparation using rotary NiTi instruments detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography

机译:根尖周放射成像和锥形束计算机断层扫描检测到的旋转镍钛器械在根管预备过程中的程序错误

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study detected procedural errors created by rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments during root canal preparation by two imaging methods. Forty extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars were divided randomly into two groups and treated by two endodontists (n=10) and two undergraduate dental students (n=10). The ProTaper UniversalTM Rotary System was used to shape the canals and then they were filled using AH PlusTM sealer and gutta-percha. Periapical radiographs (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained and two examiners, who evaluated them to verify the occurrence of procedural errors (fractured instruments, perforations, and canal transportation). The Chi-square test at 0.05 level of significance was used for statistical analyses. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between the imaging methods. In the analysis of procedural errors, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the groups of operators (endodontists vs. students) nor between tooth groups (maxillary molars vs. mandibular molars). In view of the low incidence of procedural errors during root canal preparation performed by students the introduction of rotary NiTi instruments has potential in undergraduate teaching. PR and CBCT permitted the detection of procedural errors, but the CBCT images offer more recourse for diagnosis.
机译:这项研究通过两种成像方法检测了在根管准备过程中旋转镍钛(NiTi)仪器产生的程序错误。将四十个提取的人类上颌和下颌磨牙随机分为两组,分别由两名牙髓病医生(n = 10)和两名牙科学专科学生(n = 10)治疗。使用ProTaper UniversalTM旋转系统对运河进行整形,然后使用AH PlusTM密封胶和牙胶进行填充。获得了根尖X射线照片(PR)和锥束计算机断层摄影(CBCT)图像,并由两名检查员对其进行了评估,以验证是否存在程序错误(器械破裂,穿孔和运河运输)。显着性水平为0.05的卡方检验用于统计分析。两种成像方法之间无显着差异(p> 0.05)。在分析程序错误时,操作者组(牙本质病患者与学生)之间以及牙组(上颌磨牙与下颌磨牙)之间均无显着差异(p> 0.05)。鉴于学生在进行根管准备过程中程序错误的发生率较低,因此旋转镍钛器械的引入在本科教学中具有潜力。 PR和CBCT允许检测程序错误,但是CBCT图像提供了更多的诊断手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号